Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 VA 719 - Stegall v. Commonwealth

Stegall v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 6 Va. App. 507 - Servis v. Commonwealth (1988), 14 Va. App. 423 - Turner v. Jackson (1992)

5 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

110196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Snyder v. Commonwealth · Pierce v. Commonwealth · Bradley v. Commonwealth · Ingram v. Commonwealth · Belton v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t may be disbelieved where it is inherently improbable, inconsistent with circumstances in evidence, or somewhat contradictory in itself, especially where the witness is a party.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The mere failure to return property or account for a trust fund, while evidence of a conversion, does not necessarily constitute embezzlement, but failure to perform an absolute duty to return the property or refusal to account or pay over on demand constitutes embezzlement, or is, at least, evidence from which a fraudulent conversion may be inferred.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.