208 W. Va. 36 - Mitchell v. Broadnax’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 192 W. Va. 189 - Painter v. Peavy · 194 W. Va. 138 - Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L. · Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co. · 159 W. Va. 108 - Smith v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner · 58 Cal. 2d 862 - Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Nothing contained herein shall prevent any insurer from also offering benefits and limits other than those prescribed herein, nor shall this section be construed as preventing any insurer from incorporating in such terms, conditions and exclusions as may be consistent with the premium charged.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“adjust the corresponding policy premium so that the exclusion is `consistent with the premium charged,'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Methods by which insurers may effectively communicate an exclusion to an insured to secure his/her awareness thereof may include, but are not necessarily limited to, reference to the exclusion and corresponding premium adjustment on the policy’s declarations page or procurement of the insured’s signature on a separate waiver signifying that he/ she has read and understood the coverage limitation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.