Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 208 W. Va. 521 - State v. Onapolis

208 W. Va. 521 - State v. Onapolis’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on New York v. Hill · Ullery v. State · 164 W. Va. 718 - Moore v. Whyte

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We, therefore, hold that a defendant waives his or her rights under the IAD when the defendant or defendant’s counsel requests or agrees to a trial date outside the statutory time limits.”); Ward v. Com., Ky. Ct.App., — S.W.3d -, 2001 WL 282708 at (March 23, 2001) (applying its interpretation of Hill”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.