Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 Ala. 36 - Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

352
cited by 352 later decisions
4
states following
June 2008
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 348 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 352 later decisions — most recently June 2008 · most notably 577 So. 2d 474 - Kuenzel v. State (1990), Fuller v. State (1959)

4 federal appellate · 348 state decisions

640192219301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McMillan v. Aiken · Edwards v. State · Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Gonzalez · Cross v. State · Parsons v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 352 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘An exception to the general rule requiring appropriate objection or-motion invoking corrective instruction or action by the trial court is where the remark or argument of counsel is so grossly improper and highly prejudicial to the opposing party as that neither retraction nor rebuke by the trial court would have destroyed its sinister influence * * *.’ (Citing authorities.)””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Generally, improper argument of counsel to or in the presence of the jury is not a ground "for a new trial, or the subject of review on appeal, unless there is prompt and appropriate objection by opposing counsel, a ruling by the court, and exception thereto, or a refusal of the court to rule on the question presented by the objection.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence of acts, conduct, and declarations, both before and after the time of committing the act tending to show an insane state of mind are also admissible as having some bearing upon the exact point in controversy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.