Henry v. Ide’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2001 · most notably Crowson v. Cody (1926), Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co. (1928)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Julian v. Woolbert · Randle v. Winona Coal Co. · Henry v. Ide · Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson · Bank of Florence v. United States Savings & Loan Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The appointment of a receiver rests in the sound discretion of the trial judge, subject to review for an abuse of that discretion. It is said that the exercise of this discretion will not be reversed, except in a clear case of abuse, nor when there is evidence which, when fairly considered, supports the judgment of the trial court. (Citing cases).” Henry v. Ide, 209 Ala. 367, 373 , 96 So. 698, 704 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if any other remedy will afford adequate protection to the party applying,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.