Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 Ariz. 13 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Morrison · State v. Nash · State v. McKinney · State v. Watton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The constitutional principles underlying Donald come into play only when a concrete plea offer has been made by the state, and we decline Jackson’s request, unsupported by authority, to extend Donald’s reach to include a defense counsel’s failure to investigate the speculative possibilities of a potential plea offer, the very existence of which is contested.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “essential function . . . to provide a remedy in the context of an individual case,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.