209 Ariz. 432
104 P.3d 163
Decided January 14, 2005
Court of Appeals of Arizona · decided 2005-01-14
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2017
19 state decisions
Relies on State v. Resendis-Felix
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-01-14
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1specially concurring.
¶2¶ 24 I concur in the majority’s result on both issues in this case but disagree with the majority’s application of the harmless error doctrine to the Blakely error for the reasons stated in my special concurrence in State v. Resendis-Felix, 209 Ariz. 292, ¶¶ 12-25, 100 P.3d at 461-64.