Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

209 Ariz. 452

104 P.3d 183

State v. Burdick

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 14, 2005

Court of Appeals of Arizona · decided 2005-01-14

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2006

9 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-01-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ECKERSTROM, Judge,

¶1specially concurring.

¶2¶ 18 Because I disagree that we can conduct a harmless error analysis when a Blakely error has occurred, I specially concur for the reasons set forth in my concurring opin*447ion in Resendis-Felix. As I stated in that ease, I believe Blakely error is structural in nature and not subject to such a review. In all other respects, I agree with the majority’s decision and concur with the result.

/209/ariz/452 · .json · Public domain