Amos v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently June 1981 · most notably United States v. Tomchek (1977), Clark v. State (1969)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ware v. State · Hunt v. State · Weakley v. State · Belford v. State · Bodcaw Lumber Co. v. Ford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the evidence is admissible for any purpose, then the objecting party must ask the court to limit the evidence to the one admissible purpose, or the objection is wholly unavailing. See Bodcaw Lbr. Co. v. Ford, 82 Ark. 555 , 102 S. W. 896 ; and cases collected in West’s Ark. Digest, ‘Trial,’ §§ 85, 86.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wood v. Burris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.