Adams v. Jack A.’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 8 Cal. 4th 791 - Ghirardo v. Antonioli · In Re Marriage of Burgess · Estate of Dolbeer · Howard v. Drapkin · 220 Cal. App. 3d 814 - In Re Daniel CH
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“hold a hearing to determine a reasonable compensation for [the expert's] services, if any, and the proper allocation of those fees and costs among the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“court had a duty to review [the expert's] billing statements and determine a fair compensation after an evidentiary hearing”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“court-connected ... child custody evaluators appointed under ... Evidence Code section 730....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.