Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 CONN 169 - State v. Trantolo

State v. Trantolo’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
5
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 2021

2 district · 15 state decisions

9019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Durham v. United States · State v. Raffone · United States v. Mollica · United States v. Pauline · Crooker v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]t has become clear that, in this case, there is neither allegation nor evidence that the fine levied against the defendant at trial would be collectible from his estate or that the judgment will otherwise affect its interests. On this state of the record, the defendant's appeal must be dismissed as moot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[D]ue to the death of Arcangelo, the appeal, as to him, is dismissed as moot.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.