Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 CONN 212 - Bialowans v. Minor

Bialowans v. Minor’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1989), Cioffoletti v. Planning & Zoning Commission (1989)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 46 state decisions

2801988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sturman v. Socha · Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of Fairfield · Leonard Concrete Pipe Co. v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc. · O'CONNOR v. Dory Corporation

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is intended for the CT Page 5133 information and security of third persons, who may be induced thereby to loan money to the owner of the premises on the lienor's assurance that his statutory encumbrance has been released. . .,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The interpretation of a contract involves a search for the intent of the parties. . . . Where this intent is expressed in language that is clear and unambiguous, the contract is to be given effect according to its terms.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “is the expectation that his employer will be put in funds out of which he hopes to be paid in whole or in part.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.