Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 F.1d 721 - Lawlor v. Loewe

Lawlor v. Loewe’s Empirical Analysis

209 F. 721 · 1913

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
April 1963
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1963

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

40191319201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Pettibone v. United States · Deitrich Loewe et al. v. Martin Lawlor et al. · New York Co v. Estill · Martin v. Webb · United States v. Cassidy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We see no error in the admission of testimony showing damages accruing after the commencement of the action. It must be admitted that it is for the interest of all parties that this controversy be disposed of finally in a single action. If a plurality of actions are brought the defendants will have good ground for the complaint that they are subjected to unnecessary expense and annoyance by being compelled to defend a second action, the trial of which will consume several months. The charge of persecution in such circumstances would not be without justification.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The judge charged the jury on this subject as follows: 32”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.