Feutralle v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
209 F.2d 159 · 1954
Citation profile
38 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably United States v. Davis (1973), Williamson v. United States (1964)
38 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2111
Relies on Young v. United States · Culwell v. United States · Apodaca v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While in the cáse of serious and manifest errors this failure [to make objections] would not preclude our consideration of them, we find no such errors here as .would justify our disregarding the general rule that only errors brought to the attention of the trial court, so that the court may have an opportunity for correction if necessary, will be considered on appeal.” Feutralle v. United States, 5 Cir., 1954, 209 F.2d 159 , 163.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.