F. A. R. Liquidating Corp. v. Brownell’s Empirical Analysis
209 F.2d 375 · 1954
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently September 2019 · most notably 148 W. Va. 160 - Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Federal Insurance Co. of New York (1963), Rains v. Cascade Industries, Inc. (1968)
37 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 95A · 50 U.S.C. § 4309
Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph Corp. · Begnaud v. White · Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Consolidated Fisheries Co. · Walling v. Richmond Screw Anchor Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The fact that both parties make motions for summary judgment, and each contends in support of his respective motion that no genuine issue of fact exists, does not require the Court to rule that no fact issue exists. Each, in support of his own motion, may be willing to concede certain contentions of his opponent, which concession, however, is only for the purpose of the pending motion. If the motion is overruled, the concession is no longer effective.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“* * * it is well established that cross-motions for summary judgment do not warrant the trial court granting summary judgment unless one of the moving parties is entitled to judgment as a matter of law upon facts that are not genuinely disputed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“although an affidavit filed in support of a motion for summary judgment may be considered for the purpose of ascertaining whether an issue of fact is presented, it cannot be used as a basis for deciding the fact issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.