Hospoder v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
209 F.2d 427 · 1953
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 1977 · most notably Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. (1969), Hamilton v. Nakai (1971)
17 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 701 · 38 U.S.C. § 705
Relies on Estep v. United States · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · Dickinson v. United States · Rosenberg v. United States · Forgione v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is axiomatic that jurisdiction may not be conferred or waived by the parties and that courts at every stage of the proceedings may and must examine into its existence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“shall be final and conclusive on all questions of law and fact, and no other official or court of the United States shall have jurisdiction to review by mandamus or otherwise any such decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“in a proper case under Section 11a-2 mandamus will lie even though the district court may not review the Administrator's factual or legal determinations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.