Slaten v. United States

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Jan. 15, 1954.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1954-01-15

2 counsel of record

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Arthur Winer, Inc. · Wayside Press, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1954-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 1974

12 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Irwin R. Kimzey, Clarkesville, Ga., V. D. Stockton, Clayton, Ga., for appellant.

¶2J. Ellis Mundy, U. S. Atty., Lamar N. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

¶3Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges.

¶4HUTCHESON, Chief Judge.

¶5This is an appeal from an order revoking probation granted the defendant in No. 18512-Criminal, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, upon his plea of nolo contendere to an indictment charging the use of the mails to defraud. The order, revoking probation and sentencing the defendant to serve three years in the penitentiary, was based upon the conviction of the defendant in cause No. 19,253 in the same court on an indictment charging use of the mails to defraud, the judgment in which has been this day affirmed in 209 F.2d 590.

¶6The judgment appealed from in this cause is, therefore, also affirmed.