Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 F.2d 639 - Christman v. City of Wichita

Christman v. City of Wichita’s Empirical Analysis

209 F.2d 639 · 1954

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 1965
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McAlpine v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. · Hayen v. Greenfield · Gadarl v. City of Humboldt · Edgerton v. McMullan · Swope v. Kansas City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under the law of Kansas, neither misuse nor nonuse will bring about the reverter of property dedicated to a public use. In Gadarl v. City of Humboldt, 87 Kan. 41, 123 P. 764 , the court held that when title has become vested in a municipal corporation for the public benefit, it cannot be impaired by any inaction or delay on the part of public officials in devoting the property to the uses for which it has been dedicated.” (p. 641.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.