Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 F.2d 766 - United States v. Eversole

United States v. Eversole’s Empirical Analysis

209 F.2d 766 · 1954

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
January 1966
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Brinegar v. United States · Connolly v. Medalie · Haywood v. United States · United States v. Pisano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““One who has no proprietary or possessory- interests in the premises searched or the property seized is not in a position to claim that his constitutional rights have been violated by an unreasonable search and seizure. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.