Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 F.3d 1111 - Harry Mitchell

Harry Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Liberty Tool, & Manufacturing v. Vortex Fishing System, Inc. (2001), Castillo v. G

17 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions

830200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Edelman v. Jordan · Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the Eleventh Amendment, a state is immune from suit under state or federal law by private parties in federal court absent a valid abrogation of that immunity or an express waiver by the state.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “clear declaration of the state's intention to waive its immunity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “because the State did not file a proof of claim in either case, it did not waive its immunity under 11 U.S.C. § 106 (b). Cf. In re Jackson, 184 F.3d at 1050 (finding that a state waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity when it filed a proof of claim).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.