High v. Head’s Empirical Analysis
209 F.3d 1257 · 2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2014
most recently cited
3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Coleman v. Thompson · Giglio v. United States · Murray v. Carrier · Kyles v. Whitley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“convince us that there is a reasonable probability that the result of the trial would have been different if the [allegedly suppressed items] had been disclosed to the defense. In other words, the question is whether the favorable evidence could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Brady duty is an ongoing one, and continued to bind the prosecution throughout [defendant's] habeas proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Duckett v. State“The State's duty to disclose exculpatory material is ongoing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duckett v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.