Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 F.3d 794 - Richard Conner

Richard Conner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
2
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably 226 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Cobell v. Norton (2002), In Re Paige (2007)

1 district · 2 state decisions

160200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Canton v. Harris · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Behrens v. Pelletier · State v. Simpson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure to train can amount to deliberate indifference when the need for more or different training is obvious, such as when there exists a history of abuse by subordinates that has put the supervisor on notice of the need for corrective measures, and when the failure to train is likely to result in' the violation of a constitutional right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) the training or ... [supervising] procedures of the municipality’s policymaker were inadequate, (2) the municipality’s policymaker was deliberately indifferent in adopting the ... training [or supervising] policy, and (3) the inadequate ... training [or supervising] policy directly caused the plaintiffs’ injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] district court can still calculate sanctions if [the court of appeals] determine[s] that an appeal is frivolous and remand[s] to the district court to award justifiable damages, costs, or fees.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.