In re Managed Care Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Castano v. American Tobacco Co. · Sprague v. General Motors Corp. · Pelletier v. Zweifel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendants’ medical necessity requirements, Defendants’ use of actuarial guidelines, Defendants’ use of automated claims system and comparable software capable of adjusting CPT codes and reimbursement rates and automatically delaying and denying claims as well as other uniform activities designed to deny, delay or decrease reimbursement or payments to physicians.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klay v. Humana, Inc.“`has acted in a consistent manner towards members of the class so that his actions may be viewed as part of a pattern of activity.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Courts are generally reluctant to deny class certification based on speculative problems with case management.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.