Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 FSUPP 299 - Argo v. Wiman

Argo v. Wiman’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
September 1978
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Betts v. Brady · Ex Parte Hawk No - on Rule to Show Cause and Return · Chandler v. Warden Fretag · Crooker v. State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Argo’s contention is that his conviction on the two noncapital, grand larceny offenses violated the protection afforded him by the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. On the evidence in this case, this Court concludes that the denial of Argo’s motion for a short continuance or delay so that his retained counsel, Arthur Parker, could be located and be present, and the appointment of counsel who was not familiar with Argo’s case, and the putting of Argo to trial with appointed counsel in the absence of his retained counsel, was arbitrary action on the part of the trial judge to an extent that Argo on March 17, 1960, in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, was denied his due process rights in a constitutional sense.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.