Goldberg v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 217
Relies on Kirschbaum v. Walling US Arsenal Bldg Corporation · Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. United States · Mitchell v. Lublin, McGaughy & Associates · Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co. · Alstate Const Co v. Durkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * It is the opinion of this court that the new construction doctrine announced in the Vollmer case has been limited to repairs and extensions of existing industrial facilities, and the repairs, constructions, and reconstructions of interstate facilities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wirtz v. McDaniel“* * * I do not feel that employees who are constructing a manufacturing building are closely enough related to production to place it `in that proximity to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Wirtz v. McDaniel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.