Robinson v. LaChance’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 1988
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Relies on 169 F. Supp. 125 - Putterman v. Daveler · 107 F. Supp. 56 - Peter Holding Co. v. Le Roy Foods, Inc. · Lusk v. Lyon Metal Products, Inc. · Sunbeam Corporation v. Brazin · United Artists Corp. v. Ancore Amusement Corp.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.