Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Conservation Law Foundation v. Evans

209 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Conservation Law Foundation v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

10 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently August 2023

10 district · 1 state decisions

50200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 16 U.S.C. § 1801 (American Fisheries Promotion Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1802 · 16 U.S.C. § 1851 (Atlantic Striped Bass Conservation Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1852 · 16 U.S.C. § 1853 · 16 U.S.C. § 1854 (International Fisheries Agreement Clarification Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 1855 · 16 U.S.C. § 1868

Relies on Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Taylor v. Federal Deposit Insurance · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Hodel · Torrington Company v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny fishery management plan which is prepared by any Council, or by the Secretary, with respect to any fishery, shall ... establish a standardized reporting methodology to assess the amount and type of bycatch occurring in the fishery, and include conservation and management measures that, to the extent practicable and in the following priority!:] (A) minimize by-catch; and (B) minimize the mortality of bycatch which cannot be avoided.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]hile agency decisions are due some deference . . . courts do not hear cases merely to rubber stamp agency actions. To play that role would be tantamount to abdicating the judiciary's responsibility.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.