209 F. Supp. 2d 1114 - United States v. Small’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Mauro · Carchman v. Nash New Jersey Department of Corrections · New York v. Hill · Alabama v. Bozeman · Ex Parte Bollman and Ex Parte Swartwout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.