¶1concurring specially. We concur in the judgment, but not for the reasons stated in the opinion. A contract could not possibly have any greater efficacy than a solemn judgment and decree of the court. Our reasons for concurring in the judgment here are stated in the dissenting opinion filed in Berry v. Berry, 208 Ga. 285 (66 S. E. 2d, 336).
209 Ga. 228
71 S.E.2d 639
Ramsay v. Sims
Decided June 9, 1952
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1952-06-09
Relies on Berry v. Berry
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1952-06-09
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2006 · most notably Hornung v. Estate of Lagerquist (1970), Hutchings v. Bates (1966)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →