Cleveland v. Palin’s Empirical Analysis
1936
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently July 1990
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jones v. State · People v. . Heineman · Morris v. . Sickly · Horn v. Lupton · City of Terre Haute v. Burns
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is clear that this act dealt with the printing and voting of ballots containing the names of persons nominated by parties or groups of petitioners, and that it did not purport to affect the existing method of indicating a choice for a person whose name did not appear upon the ballot as printed by the proper election board.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““It is conceded that the appellees received a majority of the votes cast at the election if those who voted paster ballots cast legal ballots.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ubelhor v. George
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.