Fast v. Fast’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Hall v. Mullen (1984), Jamison v. Consolidated Utilities, Inc. (1978)
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fry v. Dewees · Richards v. Shearer · Place v. Place · Barker v. Lashbrook · Wagner v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . [E]very conveyance of real estate shall pass all the estate of the grantor therein, unless the intent to pass a less estate shall expressly appear or be necessarily implied in the terms of the grant.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““At best we have an acquiescence by C. F. in a continuing course of conduct which was, if anything, beneficial to Jake. In Wagner v. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co., 182 Kan. 81 , 318 P.2d 1039 , we held that the signing of a division order might estop the signer vis-a-vis the oil company, but worked no estoppel as against rival claimants to the mineral interest, saying, ‘rather than reliance by the defendants to their detriment, plaintiffs’ signing of the division orders in fact gave them a benefit to which they were not entitled.’ (Id., at 93.)” 209 Kan. at 29 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“. . [E]very conveyance of real estate shall pass all the interest of the grantor therein, unless the intent to pass a lesser interest shall expressly appear or be necessarily implied in the terms of the grant.” (Platt v. Woodland, 121 Kan. 291, 298 , 246 Pac. 1017 ; and Fast v. Fast, 209 Kan. 24, 27 , 496 P. 2d 171 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.