Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 Kan. 660 - State v. Larkin

State v. Larkin’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
May 1996
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 1996 · most notably 25 Cal. 3d 283 - People v. Brigham (1979), State v. Ritson (1974)

33 state decisions

260197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Addington · State v. Aten · State v. Bridges · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘It is to be presumed that the jury understood what the words ‘reasonable doubt’ meant. The idea intended to be expressed by these words can scarcely be expressed so truly or so clearly by any other words in the English language.’ ” (Citing from State v. Davis, 48 Kan. 1, 10-11 , 28 Pac. 1092 .)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Taylor · Winegeart v. State
  2. ““Appellant first complains he was taken into custody by virtue of an arrest warrant issued upon a defective complaint and therefore the trial court erred in denying his motion for discharge. Assuming arguendo, that his arrest may have been illegal, he fails to point out resulting prejudice. We have frequently held that an illegal arrest and detention do not, standing alone, invalidate a subsequent convistion [Citation omitted.].” (p. 661.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. State v. Woods

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.