Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 La. 373 - State v. Frazier

State v. Frazier’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 1983
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 1983

12 state decisions

4019461950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Capaci · State v. Eisenhardt · State v. Scruggs · State v. White · State v. Henry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““An accused, under the constitution and laws of this state, whether guilty or innocent, is guaranteed a fair and impartial trial and it is the duty of the judge presiding over his trial to uphold such right. * * * ” State v. Frazier, 209 La. 373 , 24 So.2d 620, 621 ; State v. Borde, 209 La. 905 , 25 So.2d 736 ; LSA-Constitution of 1921, Article I, Sec. 9.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the fact of the jurors having known that defendants had been tried and acquitted on another charge of robbery did not necessarily have the effect of disqualifying them as jurors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.