Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 Md. 154 - Grillo v. State

Grillo v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
4
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1990

7 state decisions

401999decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves · Crane v. Campbell · Samuels v. McCurdy · Missionary Society of Church v. Dalles City · State v. Phillips

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * iphe j)ue process Clause was not designed to interfere with the police power of the State to prescribe regulations calculated to promote the health, morals, and good order of the people.” Grillo v. State, 120 A. 2d 384, 388 (Md. Ct. App. 1956).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.