Dakrish, LLC v. Raich’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's Counsel · Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A. · Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp. · United Steelworkers of America AFL-CIO, Local 2610 v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. · Mayor of Annapolis v. Annapolis Waterfront Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]o be aggrieved for purposes of judicial review, one must have an interest “ ‘such that he is personally and specifically affected in a way different from ... the public generally.’ ” Sugarloaf, 344 Md. at 288 [ 686 A.2d 605 ] (quoting [Med. Waste Assoc. v. Md. Waste Coalition, Inc., 327 Md. 596, 611 , 612 A.2d 241 (1992)]. Here, if an additional liquor license was granted in the immediate geographical area, Vineyards Elite, a nearby licensee, risked a direct effect to its business, increased competition, and a possible decrease in its sales. See Jordan Towing, Inc. v. Hebbville Auto Repair, Inc., 369 Md. 439, 442 [ 800 A.2d 768 ] (2002) (issuance of an additional towing license in the same vicinity where the protestants alone held licenses was sufficient standing to challenge the additional license as aggrieved parties because the protestants’ businesses were directly affected and suffered special damages different in kind from that suffered by the general public).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(i) Any alcoholic beverages licensee that holds a license issued by the local licensing board; (ii) An applicant for an alcoholic beverages license that is the subject of the decision by the local licensing board; and (iii) Any group of not less than 10 persons who are residents or real estate owners in the precinct or voting district in which the licensed place of business is located or proposed to be located.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(3) A licensee ... that appeals a decision of a local licensing board under paragraph (1) of this subsection, must be aggrieved by the decision of the board and must have appeared at the hearing of the board either in person, by a representative, or by the submission of a written document that was introduced at the hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.