Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 MICH 205 - Stamp v. Steele

Stamp v. Steele’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 1985
most recently cited

1 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1985

1 district · 11 state decisions

701920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wallace v. Harris · McKee v. Wilcox · Mull v. Smith · Russell v. Sweezey · Fulton v. Preddy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fact that after the death of Alice Stamp this property was included as assets of her estate, and sold as such, was not controlling of the rights of the plaintiff. He was exercising his rights in the property, and was not called upon to follow the action of the probate court, even if he knew of such action, which does not appear by this record.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.