Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 MICH 306 - Pearson v. Sullivan

Pearson v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
March 1976
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1976

4 state decisions

20192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Murray v. . Harway · Collins v. . Hasbrouck · Conger v. . Duryee · Gordon v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance · Barrie v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The doctrine seems to be well established that a tenant cannot, without the consent of the landlord, make material changes or alterations in a building to suit his taste or convenience, and, if he does so, it is waste. And any material change in the nature and character of the buildings made by the tenant is waste although the value of the property should be enhanced by the alterations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.