Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 Minn. 124 - Ferch v. Hiller

Ferch v. Hiller’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2000
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2000

9 state decisions

201941195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. Hardwick · Womack v. Coleman · Sanborn v. School District No. 10 · Chandler & Co. v. McDonald-Weber Co. · Heinrich v. Englund

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * Until an option is effectively exercised, it is a mere unilateral undertaking, and if the time in which it is to be exercised expires before its terms and conditions are met with, it lapses.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.