Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 Mo. App. 570 - Wechsler v. Davis

209 Mo. App. 570 - Wechsler v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1976
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1976

1 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

50192219301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lohmeyer v. St. Louis Cordage Co. · Reed v. . Chilson · Nicholes v. People ex rel. Kochersperger · Thomasson v. Mercantile Town Mutual Insurance · 204 Mo. App. 332 - Roy v. Kansas City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is that, in order for one’s appearance to be special, the order, plea, or motion must expressly state that the appearance is only for the purpose of excepting to the jurisdiction, or, at least, the order, plea, or motion on its face must appear to be a special appearance for that purpose. (Citing cases). “It is stated in 4 C.J. p. 1318, par. 5: ‘A defendant appearing specially to object to the jurisdiction of the court must, as a general rule, keep out of court for all other purposes. In other words, he must limit his appearance to that particular question or he will be held to have appeared generally and to have waived the objection.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “substituted defendant entered his appearance in said cause and adopted the answer theretofore filed by said Walker D. Hines, defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.