Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

209 N.C. 358

183 S.E 367

State v. . Wells

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 22, 1936

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1936-01-22

Decided 1936-01-22

Per Curiam.

¶1 No reversible error has been made to appear in the trial of the cause. The exception to the judgment does not seem to have been brought forward and discussed in appellant’s brief. Hence, it is deemed to be abandoned. S. v. Lea, 203 N. C., 13, 164 S. E., 737: “Exceptions in the record not set out in appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned.” Rule 28, Rules of Practice in Supreme Court; In re Beard, 202 N. C., 661, 163 S. E., 748.

¶2 No error.

/209/nc/358 · .json · Public domain