209 N.C. 362
183 S.E 294
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 22, 1936
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1936-01-22
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1953
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1936-01-22
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions discussed in defendant’s brief, as the deed attacked by the plaintiffs in this action appears on its face to be a deed of gift, and was not registered within two years as required by C. S., 3315.
¶2 The deed was therefore void. Booth v. Hairston, 195 N. C., 8.
¶3 No error.