209 N.C. App. 255 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Cortez · Delaware v. Prouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[t]he standard of review to determine whether a trial court properly denied a motion to suppress is whether the trial court’s findings of fact are supported by the evidence and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law.” State v. Tadeja, 191 N.C. App. 439, 443 , 664 S.E.2d 402, 406-07 (2008). “The trial court’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo and must be legally correct.” State v. Campbell, 188 N.C. App. 701, 704 , 656 S.E.2d 721, 724 , (citations, brackets, and quotation marks omitted), appeal dismissed, 362 N.C. 364 , 664 S.E.2d 311 (2008).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.