¶1 Order affirmed, with costs, first question certified answered in the negative; the other questions not answered; no opinion.
¶2 Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Hiscock, Chase, Hogan and Miller, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
209 N.Y. 539
102 N.E 1101
Davids v. . Bauer
Decided June 20, 1913
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1913-06-20
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February ‘l, 1913, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the answer in an action for an accounting. The following questions were certified: “(1) Does the amended complaint in this action state facts sufficient to. constitute a cause of action?
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1913-06-20
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently July 1974 · most notably In re Hornidge (1929), In Re the Probate of Will of Hitchcock (1917)
5 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →