Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

209 So. 2d 701

McKinzy v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1968-04-30

Relies on Wright v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1968-04-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1989

8 state decisions

40196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.

¶2Affirmed.

/209/so2d/701 · .json · Public domain