Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 SO3D 248 - State v. Scott

State v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dorthey · 603 So. 2d 739 - State v. Lobato · 805 So. 2d 166 - State v. Weaver · State v. Mims · 893 So. 2d 7 - State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the defendant is convicted of two or more offenses based on the same act or transaction, or constituting parts of a common scheme or plan, the terms of imprisonment shall be served concurrently unless the court expressly directs that some or all be served consecutively. Other sentences of imprisonment shall be served consecutively unless the court expressly directs that some or all of them be served concurrently.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.