Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

209 So. 3d 701

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 3, 2017

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2017-02-03

Relies on 56 So. 3d 233 - State v. Boudoin

Decided 2017-02-03

¶1Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. D, No. 529-861; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No, 2016-K-1156.

¶2Writ denied.

GUIDRY, J,, would grant.CLARK, J., would grant.
CRICHTON, J.

¶3would grant and assigns reasons

¶4hi would grant the State’s writ and reverse the trial court’s suppression of the defendant’s statement. In my view, police officers were justified in making an investigatory stop of the defendant; and upon his flight and apprehension, it was reasonable to place defendant in handcuffs pending investigation. See La. C.Cr.Pr. art. 215.1. Because the defendant’s choice to flee necessitated the detention and handcuffs, I do not deem the status to be custodial such that the Miranda advisement is required. State v. Boudoin, 2010-2868 (La. 3/4/11, 3), 56 So.3d 233, 235 (“[T]he officers’ use of handcuffs to detain the men as they questioned them briefly did not transform the stop into a de facto arrest.”) Therefore, in my view, defendant’s voluntary statement is admissible and should not have been suppressed by the trial court.

/209/so3d/701 · .json · Public domain