209 So. 3d 962 - State v. Wall’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 603 So. 2d 731 - State v. Hearold · 661 So. 2d 442 - State v. Smith · 796 So. 2d 649 - State v. Neal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A mistrial is a drastic remedy and is warranted only when trial error results in substantial prejudice to a defendant that deprives him of a reasonable expectation of a fair trial. Whether a mistrial should be granted is within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the denial of a motion for mistrial will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A mistrial should be granted under [ La.Code Crim.P. art.] 771 only where the prejudicial remarks of the witness make it impossible for the defendant to obtain a fair trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.