Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 SW2D 972 - Daniels v. Ramirez

Daniels v. Ramirez’s Empirical Analysis

1947

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
September 1962
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wheeler v. Glazer · Gainesville, Henrietta & Western Railway Co. v. Lacy · Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Compton · Francis v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Kimbriel Produce Co. v. Mayo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nor is there any showing by what authority the sign was put there. As a matter of fact, there is and was on the date of the accident a large black X across the face of it. Anyone might have been justified in the conclusion it was a cancelled out sign and was not intended to be observed, and more especially since there was none on the opposite side. Certainly a stop sign erected without authority or maintained without it could impose no duty. So, under the record made here the sign was no protection for Daniels.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.