Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 U.S. 349 - Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter

Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarter’s Empirical Analysis

209 U.S. 349 · 1908

Citation profile

885
cited by 885 later decisions
120
cited 120 times by the Supreme Court
40
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

166 federal appellate · 67 district · 370 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 885 later decisions (120 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Rochin v. People of California (1952), Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York City (1978)

166 federal appellate · 67 district · 370 state decisions — followed in 40 states

13801908191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Joseph Lochner v. People of the State of New York · Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. · Geer v. State of Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 885 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t sometimes is difficult to fix boundary stones between the private right of property and the police power when, as in the case at bar, we know of few decisions that are very much in point.”
    27 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “One whose rights, such as they are, are subject to state restriction, cannot remove them from the power of the State by making a contract about them.”
    26 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] man cannot acquire a right to property by his desire to use it in commerce among the States,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.