Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 209 VA 412 - Cardwell v. Commonwealth

Cardwell v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2019

17 state decisions

80196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Wade · Stovall v. Denno · Escobedo v. Illinois

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For evidence to be incredible it must be either so manifestly false that reasonable men ought not to believe it, or it must be shown to be false by objects or things as to the existence and meaning of which reasonable men should not differ.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.